Birtherism Is Back: Probable Cause Obama Birth Certificate Is Fraud

Sheriff Joe Arpaio, along with the help of an investigative team, has concluded that Obama’s birth certificate released last year was most likely a forgery.

Be sure to watch the videos that show how the forgery could have been made.

Here are others covering the information.

Washington Times, World Net Daily, New York Times 

About Jason Bradley

Is a former military member with experience in Iraq and time in Europe. He lives in the Washington DC area with his wife and two young children. His background is in national security and has remained in the field since separating from the military. He is a political science major with strong interests in American politics, history, economics, and foreign policy. This blog is away to express his interests and work with two outstanding members of the site, Mike and Jeff. He also contributes at Big Peace and Big Government. Email him at twe.jason@gmail.com
This entry was posted in American Politics, Current Events and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Birtherism Is Back: Probable Cause Obama Birth Certificate Is Fraud

  1. ehancock1 says:

    For those of you who still believe that Obama could have been born somewhere else than in Hawaii, a question for you:

    I’ll bet that you know (but, actually, you may have forgotten) that the US government requires, and has long required, that a child being carried into the USA must have some kind of official travel document to be admitted. This is usually a US passport for the child. Or, it could be the fact that the child is entered on the mother’s US passport. Or, it could be a US visa for the child on a foreign passport. Without one of those, we would not let the child into the country.

    So, IF Obama really had been born in Kenya (or in any country other than the USA), he would have had to have one of those documents–wouldn’t he? His family would have had to show the passport, wouldn’t they? To show the passport, they would have had to have applied for the passport or the visa for Obama. And, if Obama really were born in Kenya (or another country), they would have had to have applied for it in the US consulate or embassy there, wouldn’t they?

    Such applications are FILED by the US government. The documents exist in multiple files, the actual application itself, communication about it with Washington, entries in the passport file, entries in the application file, entries in the places where the child is carried into the USA. The Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department and the INS for eight years before Obama was elected. Don’t you think that they would have checked the claim that he was born outside the USA?

    All they had to do was find one of those files and McCain would win the election.

    Well, they never did. There is no such file.

    So the question is, do you think that the Bush Administration was part of the plot?

    Do you think that the files, the documents, the application for the documents, the communications about the documents were all lost or hidden? Remember, they are in multiple files, the file of the passport holder, the files of applications for passports, the files in the US embassy in foreign countries, the files in the State Department and in the INS (which would have checked in Obama at an entry point if he had actually traveled in 1961)–and yet no document has been found. Why not?

    The absence of the travel document, plus the Hawaii birth certificate, plus the confirmation of the facts on it by three Republican (and several Democrat) officials, plus the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, plus the witness who remembers being told of the birth and writing home about it (to her father, named Stanley, about the unusual event of a birth to a woman named Stanley). All this is evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.

  2. ehancock1 says:

    I see that Sheriff Joe is NOT questioning whether or not Obama was born in Hawaii. Good. He certainly WAS born in Hawaii. That being the case, the alleged forgery of a Hawaii birth certificate, if true, would be a crime–but it would not make Obama not eligible because he was born in Hawaii. But it is pointless for anyone who was born in Hawaii to forge a birth certificate saying that he was born in Hawaii–which is what Sheriff Joe claims.

    And he does so by using document “experts” whose names he will not release and whose expertise is unknown.

  3. ehancock1 says:

    http://www.religiousbeliefs.info/my-take-on-arizona-sheriff-joe-arpaio.html

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/292464/sheriff-joes-birther-posse-kevin-d-williamson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s